The Ottoman Empire, spanning from 1299 to 1922, was a melting pot of cultures, religions, and social practices. Its treatment of homosexuality was notably progressive compared to many contemporary societies. This article explores the nuanced and multifaceted nature of homosexuality within the Ottoman Empire, highlighting its decriminalization, the role of the sultans’ harems, and the social spaces like hamams where homosexual relationships thrived.
Decriminalization of Homosexuality
The Ottoman Empire holds the distinction of being one of the first states to decriminalize homosexuality. In 1858, during the Tanzimat reforms, the Ottoman Penal Code was introduced, which notably omitted any references to homosexual acts. This progressive stance can be contrasted with the severe punishments for homosexuality prevalent in Europe during the same period. The decriminalization signified a significant shift in social and legal attitudes, contributing to a more tolerant environment for same-sex relationships.
The Sultan’s Harem: A Complex Social Space
The sultan’s harem, often depicted in Orientalist fantasies as a space of heterosexual indulgence, also had a complex dimension regarding homosexuality. The harem was a secluded part of the palace where the sultan’s wives, concubines, and children lived, but it also included eunuchs and young male attendants. Historical records suggest that relationships between male members of the harem and even between sultans and their male favorites were not uncommon.
Mehmed II: The Conqueror’s Affection
Mehmed II, also known as Mehmed the Conqueror, who ruled from 1444 to 1446 and again from 1451 to 1481, is one of the most prominent sultans associated with homosexual relationships. His reign marked significant military conquests, including the capture of Constantinople, but his personal life also reflected the complex social norms of the time, including same-sex relationships.
Mehmed II and Radu the Fair
Mehmed II’s affection for a young man named Radu the Fair, a hostage from Wallachia, is well-documented. Radu, known for his striking beauty, was said to have captured the sultan’s heart. Their relationship exemplifies the acceptance of male love in the upper echelons of Ottoman society. This bond was not only personal but also political, as Radu’s presence in the Ottoman court symbolized the sultan’s power and influence over Wallachia.
The Animosity with Vlad the Impaler
This intimate relationship played a part in the animosity between Mehmed II and Radu’s brother, Vlad the Impaler (Dracula). Vlad harbored deep resentment towards the Ottomans and his brother’s close ties with the sultan. While political and territorial conflicts were the primary reasons for their hostility, the personal dimension of Radu’s relationship with Mehmed added fuel to the fire. Vlad’s legendary brutality and opposition to the Ottoman Empire can be partly understood as a reaction to his brother’s perceived subjugation and the intimate bond with Mehmed II.
The Acceptance of Male Love
The relationship between Mehmed II and Radu the Fair highlights the cultural context of the time, where male beauty and same-sex love were celebrated and accepted, particularly within the court. Such relationships were seen as expressions of affection and loyalty, integral to the social fabric of the Ottoman elite. The bond between Mehmed II and Radu illustrates the complex interplay of personal affection and political alliance in the Ottoman Empire.
Mehmed II’s reign is often remembered for his military conquests and administrative reforms, but his personal life provides a deeper understanding of the social norms and cultural values of the Ottoman court. The affection between Mehmed II and Radu the Fair, and the resulting animosity with Vlad the Impaler, reveal the intricate connections between personal relationships and political dynamics in the Ottoman Empire. This relationship serves as a poignant example of the acceptance of same-sex love in the historical context of one of the most powerful empires in the world.
Osman II: The Tragic Sultan
Osman II, who ruled from 1618 to 1622, was a young and ambitious sultan whose short reign ended in tragedy. Osman had a close relationship with one of his pages, a young man named Ibrahim. The nature of their relationship was the subject of much speculation, with contemporary sources hinting at a deep emotional and possibly romantic bond. Osman’s eventual downfall and assassination in 1622 were partly attributed to the political machinations within the palace, where his relationships and reformist ideas clashed with entrenched interests.
Murad IV: The Warrior Sultan
Murad IV, who ruled the Ottoman Empire from 1623 to 1640, is often remembered for his military prowess and strict authoritarian rule. He was a formidable leader, known for restoring the empire’s military strength and enforcing stringent laws to maintain public order. However, beneath his stern exterior lay a personal life that reflected the cultural norms and social practices of his time, including relationships with young men. These relationships, while perhaps surprising to modern readers, were characteristic of the period’s appreciation for male beauty and the close bonds between men.
Emir-i Kun: The King of Arses
One of the most notable figures in Murad IV’s personal life was Emir-i Kun, a title that translates to “King of Arses” (with “kun” being the Persian word for “arse”). Emir-i Kun played a significant role in Murad IV’s private indulgences, a fact recorded by several contemporary observers. His responsibilities included finding young men from the bazaar and other public places to entertain and please the sultan.
Emir-i Kun’s influence in Murad IV’s court was substantial. He organized elaborate gatherings and intimate meetings, which were a testament to the period’s unique social dynamics and the cultural acceptance of such relationships. These gatherings were not merely private indulgences but also served as social functions that reflected the sophisticated and multifaceted nature of the Ottoman court.
Emirgan: The Legacy of Emir-i Kun
The impact of Emir-i Kun extended beyond the walls of the sultan’s palace. He was commissioned to oversee the construction of a palace in a picturesque area of Istanbul, which came to be known as Emirgan. Initially named after Emir-i Kun, the area’s name evolved over time to become Emirgan, a reflection of his lasting influence on the city’s geography and history.
Emirgan, located along the Bosphorus, became a symbol of the luxurious and indulgent lifestyle enjoyed by some of the empire’s elite. The area, with its beautiful gardens and stunning views, was a fitting tribute to a figure who played such a prominent role in the private life of one of the Ottoman Empire’s most powerful sultans.
Contextualizing Murad IV’s Relationships
Murad IV’s relationships with young men, including those facilitated by Emir-i Kun, were not unusual for the time. The Ottoman Empire, like many other societies throughout history, had a complex and multifaceted approach to sexuality. Relationships between men were often seen as expressions of affection, loyalty, and admiration for male beauty. These relationships were celebrated in various forms of art and literature, reflecting a cultural norm that appreciated the aesthetic and emotional bonds between men.
Homoeroticism in Ottoman Art and Literature: Celebrating Male Beauty
Ottoman art and literature provide a rich tapestry of references to homoeroticism, celebrating male beauty and same-sex love in various forms. This cultural acceptance and celebration of male-male affection are evident in the works of several prominent poets and artists of the era. One of the most distinguished poets of the Ottoman period, Nedim, is renowned for his passionate verses dedicated to young male lovers. His poetry often extolled the beauty of youth and the intensity of romantic and erotic affection between men.
Nedim: Poet of Passion and Beauty
Nedim’s work is particularly notable for its vivid descriptions and emotional depth, capturing the essence of romantic and erotic love. His poems are filled with admiration for the physical beauty and charm of young men, reflecting the cultural norms of his time. One of his renowned poems reads:
“Let us drink from the Fountain of Life,
Intoxicated with love, each moment anew.
Oh, you beautiful one, springtime of my life,
In your arms, I find a love divine and eternal.”
This poem is a clear testament to Nedim’s celebration of same-sex love. A significant part of this poem includes the line mentioning “going to Friday prayers” clearly indicating that the subject of his affection was male. This practice is specific to men in Islamic culture, making it evident that Nedim’s poetry was celebrating a same-sex love. The reference to Friday prayers, a male-only religious practice in Islam, underscores the homoerotic nature of his work and the societal acceptance of such relationships in the Ottoman era.
Art and Literature as Cultural Reflections
The celebration of male beauty and same-sex love in Ottoman art and literature was not confined to poetry alone. Miniature paintings, calligraphy, and other forms of visual art from this period also depict intimate and affectionate relationships between men. These works often illustrate scenes of convivial gatherings, private moments of affection, and the aesthetic admiration of male beauty, further highlighting the cultural norms of the time.
Şehrengiz: Celebrating the Male Beauties
Şehrengiz, a unique literary genre in Ottoman literature, specifically celebrated the beauty of young men in different cities. These works often highlighted the charm of young male artisans and their erotic allure.
Two verses from this genre illustrate the societal attitudes towards these relationships:
“I have neither silver nor gold to spend on hunting those beautiful boys. Now they are hunted by those with plenty of money.”
“Even if you give your life to these boys, they wouldn’t value it even for a penny. They do not bargain with the penniless.”
These verses reflect the commodification of beauty and the economic transactions involved in relationships with young men.
The works of poets like Nedim and the visual arts of the Ottoman Empire provide a window into a society where homoeroticism was not only accepted but also celebrated. These artistic expressions reveal a complex and multifaceted approach to sexuality, one that cherished the beauty of youth and the depth of emotional and romantic bonds between men. By appreciating these works, we gain a deeper understanding of the cultural richness and diversity of the Ottoman Empire, challenging contemporary perceptions and highlighting the timeless nature of love and beauty.
Hamams: Social and Erotic Venues in Ottoman Culture
Hamams, or Turkish baths, were integral to Ottoman social life and served as significant venues for same-sex interactions. These public baths were spaces where men of various social standings could interact freely, away from the rigid structures of daily life. The intimate setting of the hamam provided an ideal environment for both platonic and erotic encounters.
The Architecture and Atmosphere of Hamams
The architecture of the hamam, with its series of progressively hotter rooms and communal bathing areas, facilitated close physical contact and fostered a culture of homoerotic appreciation. These baths typically included an undressing room (camekan), a warm room (ılıklık), a hot room (hararet), and a cooling-off area. This design not only promoted hygiene and relaxation but also created opportunities for intimate interactions.
Tellaks: The Young Male Attendants
Central to the hamam experience were the tellaks, young male attendants who assisted bathers with washing and massage. Tellaks often became the subjects of admiration and desire, their beauty and youth celebrated in the poetry and literature of the time. The close physical proximity and the nurturing care provided by tellaks in the steamy, secluded environment of the hamam contributed to the homoerotic culture prevalent in these spaces.
Cultural Reflections in Art and Literature
The societal acceptance of homoerotic interactions in hamams is reflected in the art and literature of the Ottoman period. Poets and writers often depicted the beauty of tellaks and the sensual experiences within the hamam. These works highlight the cultural norms that appreciated and celebrated same-sex affection.
For instance, the Ottoman poet Nedim, known for his passionate verses dedicated to young male lovers, would have found ample inspiration in the interactions within hamams. His poetry often extolled the beauty of youth and the intensity of romantic and erotic affection between men, mirroring the intimate experiences of the hamam.
Hamams played a crucial role in the social and erotic life of the Ottoman Empire. They provided a unique space where men could relax, socialize, and form intimate bonds, away from the constraints of their daily lives. The architectural design of the hamam and the presence of young male attendants created an environment conducive to both platonic and erotic encounters, reflecting the cultural norms and societal acceptance of homoerotic appreciation during the Ottoman period. The celebration of these interactions in contemporary art and literature further underscores the significance of hamams in the rich tapestry of Ottoman
The Civelek Battalion in the Ottoman Empire
The Civelek Battalion was a special unit within the Ottoman military, established to cater to the sexual needs of the Janissaries during wars. These battalions were comprised of young men, referred to as “civelek,” who were known for their cheerful and sociable nature. Each civelek was paired with a Janissary, creating a system where homosexual relationships were institutionalized within the military context. This arrangement was necessitated by the fact that Janissaries, as elite soldiers of the empire, were prohibited from marrying, which meant that they often spent long periods away from home without the company of women. The establishment of the Civelek Battalion was a pragmatic solution to ensure the well-being and morale of these soldiers during extended military campaigns.
The term “civelek” literally means “cheerful” and “sociable,” and also refers to a young man newly inducted into the Janissary corps. These young men played a crucial role in maintaining the morale of the Janissaries, accompanying them during long military campaigns. Their presence was intended to provide emotional and physical support, reflecting the cultural norms of the time, where same-sex relationships were not only accepted but also institutionalized within certain contexts. The civeleks were organized and had their own form of representation, as evidenced by the existence of a sort of “union” that looked after their interests. This structured approach to same-sex relationships within the military is documented in various historical texts, including the “Sawaqub al-Manakib” (The Shining Stars of Stories), which even details the sexual practices within this battalion.
Despite the misconceptions that the Ottoman army was composed solely of Janissaries, the military system was more complex, including soldiers from the timar system. The Janissaries, who were primarily based in Istanbul, could not have numbered as many as some exaggerated accounts suggest. The population of Istanbul during the Battle of Mohács (1526) was around 200,000, making it unrealistic for one in four people to be a Janissary. The Civelek Battalion thus represents a fascinating aspect of the Ottoman military, blending the personal and the institutional in a unique way. This unit not only highlights the cultural acceptance of same-sex relationships in the Ottoman Empire but also underscores the pragmatic approaches taken to maintain the efficiency and morale of one of the most formidable military forces of the time.
Cross-Dressing Dancers in the Ottoman Era
Cross-dressing dancers, known as köçek, were a prominent feature of entertainment in the Ottoman era, captivating audiences with their elaborate performances. These young male dancers, often dressed in women’s clothing, performed in various settings, including palace courts, public festivals, and private gatherings. The köçek danced to traditional music, displaying a blend of grace, agility, and sensuality that delighted spectators. Their performances often included elements of mimicry and theatricality, with the dancers adopting feminine mannerisms and movements. The presence of köçek reflects the Ottoman society’s nuanced views on gender and sexuality, where such performances were appreciated for their artistry and erotic appeal. This cultural phenomenon highlights the complex interplay between gender identity and performance art in the Ottoman period, offering a unique lens through which to understand the empire’s social and cultural fabric.
Lesbian Relationships in the Ottoman Empire
Lesbian relationships, though less documented than their male counterparts, were also a part of the social fabric of the Ottoman Empire. Within the confines of the harem, where women were often secluded from the outside world, intimate relationships among women were not uncommon. The lack of male presence and the close quarters in which these women lived fostered an environment where deep emotional and physical bonds could form. The use of devices such as the “zıbık,” a term referring to a makeshift phallus, was reported among the women of the harem, highlighting the lengths to which they would go to seek sexual satisfaction in a male-absent setting. These relationships, while often kept private, were acknowledged in various historical texts and reflect the adaptive strategies women employed to cope with their restrictive circumstances.
The seclusion of women in Ottoman society, particularly in elite and royal settings, often led to the development of unique social dynamics within the harem. Lesbian relationships were sometimes viewed as a form of resistance against the patriarchal constraints imposed on women. The intimate bonds formed between women in the harem were not merely sexual but also provided emotional support and companionship in an otherwise isolated existence. Literary works and historical accounts subtly reference these relationships, indicating their prevalence and social acceptance to some degree. The relationships among women in the Ottoman Empire thus offer a glimpse into the hidden layers of social interactions and highlight the complex interplay of gender, sexuality, and power within a historically patriarchal society.
Conclusion
The Ottoman Empire’s approach to homosexuality was remarkably progressive for its time, characterized by decriminalization, the acceptance of homoerotic relationships within elite circles, and the existence of social spaces that facilitated such interactions. Within the elite circles, sultans like Mehmed II and Murad IV were known for their relationships with young men, a practice woven into the cultural fabric of the time. Figures like Emir-i Kun, who facilitated these relationships, and the palace commissioned for him, now known as Emirgan, illustrate the institutional acceptance and celebration of male beauty and affection. Similarly, poets like Nedim and the existence of köçek dancers showcased the era’s nuanced views on gender and sexuality. Hamams, or Turkish baths, provided venues for intimate male interactions, while the harem’s seclusion fostered lesbian relationships among women, further illustrating the adaptive and resilient nature of human affection within the empire. Even the military was not devoid of such dynamics, with the Janissaries’ “Civelek Taburu” catering to their needs, highlighting the empire’s complex and multifaceted approach to same-sex relationships. These practices, reflected in art, literature, and societal norms, underscore the Ottoman Empire’s unique social fabric and its layered approach to gender and sexuality.
References
- Bosworth, C. E. (2002). The New Islamic Dynasties: A Chronological and Genealogical Manual. Edinburgh University Press.
- Peirce, L. P. (1993). The Imperial Harem: Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire. Oxford University Press.
- Finkel, C. (2005). Osman’s Dream: The History of the Ottoman Empire. Basic Books.
- Faroqhi, S. (2004). Subjects of the Sultan: Culture and Daily Life in the Ottoman Empire. I.B. Tauris.
- Boyar, E., & Fleet, K. (2010). A Social History of Ottoman Istanbul. Cambridge University Press.
- Ze’evi, D. (2006). Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500-1900. University of California Press.